Efficacy and safety of the coplanar technique compared to conventional derotation techniques for spinal deformity surgery: a health technology assessment in children adolescents and adults
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35434/rcmhnaaa.2022.15Supl.%201.1540Keywords:
Scoliosis, Spinal Curvatures, Traumatology, Orthopedic Procedures, Technology Assessment, BiomedicalAbstract
A health technology assessment (HTA) was carried out to critically analyze the evidence on the efficacy and safety of the surgical correction of spinal deformities using the coplanar technique, compared to the conventional derotation techniques, in children, adolescents and adults. A systematic search of the literature was carried out in the PubMed, Cochrane Library and LILACS databases. In addition, a manual search was carried out in the reference lists of the included studies, on Google and on the websites of specialized societies and groups that produce clinical practice guidelines (CPG) and HTA. In addition, we searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP) for clinical trial records in progress or not completed. Five documents were selected for evaluation, including two CPG, a randomized clinical trial, and two observational studies. After a critical evaluation of the evidence, it was concluded that both techniques showed a similar efficacy profile in terms of relevant outcomes such as correction of curvatures in the coronal and sagittal planes, quality of life and surgical time. Likewise, the rates of screw malposition, complications and volume of blood loss did not show significant differences between both techniques. However, the profile of opportunity cost of the systems that allow the application of the coplanar technique is not favorable in the context of the evaluation, due to its high cost concerning conventional systems.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Lam JC, Mukhdomi T. Kyphosis [Internet]. StatPearls. 2021 [cited 2021 Sep 14]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK558945/
Janicki JA, Alman B. Scoliosis: Review of diagnosis and treatment. Paediatr Child Health [Internet]. 2007 Nov;12(9):771–6. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/pch/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/pch/12.9.771
Qiabi M, Chagnon K, Beaupré A, Hercun J, Rakovich G. Scoliosis and Bronchial Obstruction. Can Respir J [Internet]. 2015;22(4):206–8. Available from: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L605463923
Tsiligiannis T, Grivas T. Pulmonary function in children with idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis. 2012;7(1):1–6.
MedlinePLus. Escoliosis [Internet]. MedlinePLus. 2019 [cited 2021 Sep 24]. Available from: https://medlineplus.gov/spanish/ency/article/001241.htm#:~:text=De haber síntomas%2C estos pueden,más alto que el otro)
Konieczny MR, Senyurt H, Krauspe R. Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop. 2013;7(1):3–9.
Dagdia L, Kokabu T, Ito M. Classification of adult spinal deformity: Review of current concepts and future directions. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2019;3(1):17–26.
Daubs M, Watkins-Castillo S. Burden of Spinal Deformity. The Burden of Musculoskeletal Diseases in the United States. 2014;
Smith C, Lamba N, Ou Z, Vo Q-A, Araujo-Lama L, Lim S, et al. The prevalence of complications associated with lumbar and thoracic spinal deformity surgery in the elderly population: a meta-analysis. J Spine Surg. 2019;5(2):223–35.
Columbia University. Neurosurgery [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Sep 14]. Available from: https://www.neurosurgery.columbia.edu/patient-care/conditions/spinal-deformities
Senkoylu A, Cetinkaya M. Correction manoeuvres in the surgical treatment of spinal deformities. EFORT Open Rev. 2017;2(5):135–40.
Vallespir GP, Flores JB, Trigueros IS, Sierra EH, Fernández PD, Olaverri JCR, et al. Vertebral coplanar alignment a standardized technique for three dimensional correction in scoliosis surgery: Technical description and preliminary results in lenke type 1 curves. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(14):1588–97.
He S, Bao H, Zhu Z, Qiu Y, Zhu F, Zhou H, et al. Vertebral coplanar alignment technique: a surgical option for correction of adult thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J [Internet]. 2016 Feb 29;25(2):417–23. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00586-015-4080-1
DiCenso A, Bayley L, Haynes B. Accessing pre-appraised evidence: Fine-tuning the 5S model into a 6S model. Evid Based Nurs. 2009;12(4):99–101.
Ministerio de Salud de Chile. Guía de práctica clínica para el tratamiento quirúrgico de escoliosis en personas menores de 25 años [Internet]. In, ed MINSAL. Santiago, Chile; 2020 [cited 2021 Sep 8]. Available from: https://diprece.minsal.cl/garantias-explicitas-en-salud-auge-o-ges/tratamiento-quirurgico-de-escoliosis-en-personas-menores-de-25-anos/recomendaciones-grade/
Ministerio de Salud de Chile. Guía de práctica clínica para el tratamiento quirúrgico de escoliosis en personas menores de 25 años [Internet]. In, ed MINSAL. 2005 [cited 2021 Sep 8]. Available from: https://www.saludquillota.cl/informacion_ges/Guias Clinicas GES/GES 2005/Guia GES Escoliosis menores 25 años 2005.pdf
Ministerio de Salud de Chile. Guía de práctica clínica para el tratamiento quirúrgico de escoliosis en personas menores de 25 años [Internet]. In, ed MINSAL. 2010 [cited 2021 Sep 8]. Available from: http://www.bibliotecaminsal.cl/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Tratamiento-Quirúrgico-Escoliosis-menores-25-años.pdf
Ward WT, Friel NA, Kenkre TS, Brooks MM, Londino JA, Roach JW. SRS-22r Scores in Nonoperated Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients with Curves Greater Than Forty Degrees. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(16):1233–40.
Weiss HR. Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) - An indication for surgery? A systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(10):799–807.
Bettany-Saltikov J, Weiss HR, Chockalingam N, Taranu R, Srinivas S, Hogg J, et al. Surgical versus non-surgical interventions in people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(4).
Bettany-Saltikov J, Weiss HR, Chockalingam N, Kandasamy G, Arnell T. A comparison of patient-reported outcome measures following different treatment approaches for adolescents with severe idiopathic scoliosis: A systematic review. Asian Spine J. 2016;10(6):1170–94.
Mullender MG, Blom NA, De Kleuver M, Fock JM, Hitters WMGC, Horemans AMC, et al. A Dutch guideline for the treatment of scoliosis in neuromuscular disorders. Scoliosis. 2008;3(1):1–14.
Miller F, Moseley CF, Koreska J. Spinal fusion in duchenne muscular dystrophy. Dev Med Child Neurol [Internet]. 2008 Nov 12;34(9):775–86. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1992.tb11516.x
Brown JC, Zeller JL, Swank SM, Furumasu J, Warath SL. Surgical and Functional Results of Spine Fusion in Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [Internet]. 1989 Jul;14(7):763–70. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/00007632-198907000-00020
Banta J V. [Spinal disorders in cerebral palsy--surgical procedure]. Orthopade [Internet]. 1992 Sep;21(5):309–15. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1408124
Qiu Y, Zhu F, Wang B, Yu Y, Zhu Z, Qian B, et al. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Lenke Type 1 Idiopathic Scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech [Internet]. 2011 Dec;24(8):492–9. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/00024720-201112000-00003
Weissmann KA, Barrios C, Lafage V, Lafage R, Costa MA, Álvarez D, et al. Vertebral Coplanar Alignment Technique Versus Bilateral Apical Vertebral Derotation Technique in Neuromuscular Scoliosis. Glob Spine J [Internet]. 2021 Feb 9;219256822199231. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2192568221992313
Sun L, Song Y, Liu L, An Y, Zhou C, Zhou Z. Bilateral apical vertebral derotation technique by vertebral column manipulation compared with vertebral coplanar alignment technique in the correction of lenke type 1 idiopathic scoliosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord [Internet]. 2013 Dec 31;14(1):175. Available from: https://bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2474-14-175
Horng MH, Kuok CP, Fu MJ, Lin CJ, Sun YN. Cobb angle measurement of spine from x-ray images using convolutional neural network. Comput Math Methods Med. 2019;2019.
Carreon LY, Sanders JO, Diab M, Sucato DJ, Sturm PF, Glassman SD. The minimum clinically important difference in scoliosis research society-22 appearance, activity, and pain domains after surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(23):2079–83.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Diego Azañedo, José A. Zavala-Loayza, Carlos J. Toro-Huamanchumo, Maribel M. Castro-Reyes, Verónica Peralta, Rodrigo Alejandro-Salinas, Eric R. Peña-Sanchez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
