Scientific Writing Series: Systematic Review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35434/rcmhnaaa.2021.141.906

Keywords:

Systemic review, Review, Evidence synthesis

Abstract

Introduction: The systematic review is the comprehensive, reproducible, critical, and detailed evaluation of the best available evidence in response to a specific research question. To achieve this, systematic reviews should cover at least the following seven steps: i) a detailed and structured research question using the PICO technique; ii) evidence eligibility criteria; iii) a precise and reproducible search strategy; iv) selection of evidence and data extraction; v) analysis of biases; vi) synthesis of results; and vii) publication. If the data are sufficient and homogeneous, it is feasible to include their meta-analysis to synthesize results. In this way, systematic reviews and meta-analyzes can generate new and fundamental knowledge for decision-making in the clinical and other areas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Antonio M. Quispe, Médico Epidemiólogo

  1. Universidad Continental, Lima-Perú.

Yessica Hinojosa-Ticona, Estudiante de Medicina Humana

  1. Facultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann, Tacna, Perú.

Herbert A. Miranda, Estudiante de Medicina Humana

  1. Facultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad Nacional del Altiplano, Puno, Perú.

Claudia A. Sedano, Médico Cirujano

  1. University of Alabama at Birmingham, EEUU.

Published

2021-06-09

How to Cite

1.
Quispe AM, Hinojosa-Ticona Y, Miranda HA, Sedano CA. Scientific Writing Series: Systematic Review. Rev. Cuerpo Med. HNAAA [Internet]. 2021 Jun. 9 [cited 2024 Nov. 22];14(1):94-9. Available from: http://cmhnaaa.org.pe/ojs/index.php/rcmhnaaa/article/view/906

Issue

Section

Special contribution

Recommended Articles