Peer Reviewers

Peer review: Peer review is a tool used in the critical assessment of manuscripts sent to journals by experts, who are not part of the editorial staff, in order to measure their quality, feasibility, and scientific rigor. This journal evaluates each manuscript using a "double-blind" peer review process. After a preliminary assessment by the Editorial Team, the manuscripts will be sent to a minimum of two external and independent reviewers of the journal to assess the scientific quality of the submission, up to a maximum of two review opportunities. The editorial team will be the body responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the publication of the articles.

Information for reviewers

Peer reviewers of the Revista del Cuerpo Médico Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo play a vital role in evaluating the quality of scientific articles. Reviewers generally receive 0 to 4 review requests per year (exceptionally more than that number), depending on the manuscript topics we receive. You can always decline a request or indicate unavailable dates.

If you would like to volunteer to review scientific articles, you can register at the following link: http://cmhnaaa.org.pe/ojs/index.php/rcmhnaaa/user/register

 

Peer Review Resources

The following articles provide perspectives and guidance on the peer review process:

• Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2015; available on the Assocation of American Medical Colleges website. 
• Spicer, A., y Roulet, T. (2018, 7 de diciembre). Explainer: what is peer review?The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/explainer-what-is-peer-review-27797
  (s.f.). El proceso de revisión por pares. https://www.springer.com/la/authors-editors/tutoriales-de-autores-y-revisores/submitting-to-a-journal-and-peer-review/peer-review-process/12022854
• CSISZAR, A. Peer review: Troubled from the start [online]. Nature. 2016 [viewed 15 January 2020]. Available from: https://www.nature.com/news/peer-review-troubled-from-the-start-1.19763
• DONDIO, P. The “invisible hand” of peer review: The implications of author-referee networks on peer review in a scholarly jornal. Journal of Informetrics[online]. 2019, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 708-716 [viewed 15 January 2020]. DOI: 1016/j.joi.2019.03.018. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157718304206

Review formats  (download PDF)

  Formato de Revision de Articulo Original

  Formato de Revision de articulo Reporte de caso

  Formato de evaluación Contribución especial-Articulo Especial

 

acknowledgment

Peer reviewers are essential to improve the studies of the Journal of the Medical Corps Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo. We are grateful to those who have volunteered their time and expertise to read and critique submissions over the years.

The journal will award each reviewer a certificate for the review performed, and their name will appear on the journal's platform in the annual list of reviewers.